Main Article on Name/Gender Change
Updated June 2023: Read my article on Name/Gender Change (it has been viewed over 25,000 times) and is regularly updated.
Practice
Status of Same-Sex Marriage in United States
- Written by Michael V. Lauro, Jr. Michael V. Lauro, Jr.
- Last Updated: August 25, 2013 August 25, 2013
- Views: 8533 8533
-
Federal Laws on Same-Sex Marriage
-
U.S. Constitution: No provision prevents same-sex marriage or any other relationship law listed below.
-
Statute - Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) of 1996
-
Section 1. This Act may be cited as "Defense of Marriage Act."
-
Section 2. No State, territory, or possession of the United States, or Indian tribe, shall be required to give effect to any public act, record, or judicial proceeding of any other State, territory, possession, or tribe respecting a relationship between persons of the same sex that is treated as a marriage under the laws of such other State, territory, possession, or tribe, or a right or claim arising from such relationship.
-
Section 3. federal definition, any act of congress or admin bureaus/agencies, marriage is only one man and woman as husband and wife, and spouse is only opposite sex.
-
-
Challenge to DOMA
-
Windsor v. United States: http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/windsor-v-united-states-2/
-
-
Challenge to California's Proposition 8
-
Hollingsworth v. Perry: http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/hollingsworth-v-perry/
-
-
-
Summary of State Relationship Laws
-
Full Marriage Equality: Connecticut (2010); District of Columbia (2010); Iowa (2009); Maine (2012); Maryland (2012); Massachusetts (2004); New Hampshire (2010); New York (2011); Rhode Island (2013); Vermont (2009); Washington (2012); Coquille Indian Tribe; Suquamish Tribe; Little Traverse Bay Bands of Odawa Indians.
-
All/Most Rights & Responsibilities of Marriage
-
Civil Unions: Colorado (eff. 05/01/2013), Delaware (2011), Hawaii (2012), Illinois (2011), New Jersey (2007), Rhode Island (2011), Vermont (unavailable as of 09/01/2009, existing civil unions remain valid); New Hampshire (2008, until 2011, existing civil unions converted to marriage); Connecticut (2005, until 10/01/2010 when all civil unions were converted to marriages)
-
Broad Domestic Partnerships: California (1999-2005, 4 sets of legislation); Nevada (2009); Washington; New Jersey (2004, but only for opposite sex couples over age 62); Oregon (2008)
-
-
Some Rights & Responsibilities of Marriage
-
Limited Domestic Partnerships: Maine (2004, until 2012), Wisconsin (2009), Washington (2007; On 06/30/2014, these will be limited to couples in which one of the persons is 62 years of age or older, and all existing same-sex partnerships will be converted to marriage unless dissolved or converted to marriage before that date); District of Columbia (1992; On 03/03/2010, couples in a domestic partnership could apply for marriage license)
-
Reciprocal Beneficiaries: Hawaii (1997; still in effect; not limited to same-sex couples; may be used by two parties, even if they are related )
-
Designated Beneficiary Agreements: Colorado (until 05/01/2013)
-
-
Recognition of Out-of-State Same-Sex Marriages, Civil Unions, Domestic Partnerships
-
If you have a client who has a same-sex partner, and they are validly married, civilly united, or domestic partnered in another state, it is important that you become familiar with the corresponding law in the other state. The laws in this area change frequently, and there is a lack of completely compiled documentation out there as a one-stop reference.
-
Recognition of Out-of-state Same-Sex Marriages
-
Basic marriage recognition rule: a marriage is valid in a home state if it was valid where performed unless it is against the public policy of the home state.
-
Marriage Equality states that allow same-sex marriage should recognize other out-of-state same-sex marriages. Confirmed: Maine, D.C. & Maryland
-
Non-Recognition states that recognize out-of-state same-sex marriages: Rhode Island (2012), Delaware (2012)
-
-
Recognition of Out-of-state Civil Unions
-
Colorado (eff. 05/01/2013), New Hampshire (2008), Maine, D.C. & Maryland.
-
-
Recognition of Foreign Domestic Partnerships
-
In most instances, DPs are not recognized outside of the jurisdiction in which they are performed.
-
Maine; D.C.: if DP is on Mayor-maintained list and out-of-state DP is substantially similar to D.C.'s DP.
-
-
-
Same-sex marriage prevented by statute only
-
Delaware, Illinois, Indiana, Minnesota, Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Wyoming
-
-
Same-sex marriage prevented by state constitutional amendment
-
Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Wisconsin
-
-
Same-sex marriage prevented by state constitutional amendment and statute
-
Arkansas and others.
-
-
States with potential in 2013 for same-sex marriage through legislation, ballot measures, or court actions:
-
Illinois, Rhode Island, Delaware, New Jersey, California, Hawaii, Minnesota.
-
Delaware passed marriage legislation on Thursday, May 2, 2013, effective August 1, 2013. Governor Lincoln Chafee signed the legislation.
-
-
Arkansas Individual Rights and Liberties Attorney
- Written by Administrator Administrator
- Last Updated: October 18, 2016 October 18, 2016
- Views: 279306 279306
Individual Rights and Liberties are those that concern basic rights and freedoms that are guaranteed -- either explicitly identified in the Bill of Rights and the Constitution, or interpreted through the years by courts and lawmakers. These rights include your:
- First Amendment rights - freedom of speech, association and assembly; freedom of the press, and freedom of religion
- Right to equal protection under the law- protection against unlawful discrimination
- Right to due process - fair treatment by the government whenever the loss of your liberty or property is at stake
- Right to privacy - freedom from unwarranted government intrusion into your personal and private affairs.
If you believe your individual rights or civil liberties have been violated, please contact
Lauro Law, PLLC by calling 501-613-6529 or email at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. to discuss your case.
Lauro Law, PLLC offers free consultations and evening and weekend appointments.